SUKANTHAM P BAYNES v. THEJESWINI
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as not
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed reserving liberty as sought for. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL
Judgment
REINSTATE (RESTORE) THE PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER IN STATUS AS HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER OF PHYSICS AS PRIOR TO THE START OF THE DISPUTE AND ETC. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:37823 WP No. 1630 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action.
The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
Operative part
Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed reserving liberty as sought for. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as not
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.