(BY SRI. DIWAKAR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) v. BENGALURLU - 560 020
Case at a glance
- Bench
- M I ARUN
- Neutral citation
- 2024:KHC:36077
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the Writ Petition is hereby dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
1. SMT. SHANTHAMMA, W/O LATE KALAPPA, D/O Y.V. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS.
2. SRI. Y.R. BALAKRISHNA, S/O Y.V. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS.
3. SRI. Y.R. ANJANAPPA, S/O Y.V. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS.
4. SRI. Y.R. BABU, S/O Y.V. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
5. SRI. Y.R. GOPI, S/O Y.V RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO. 1415, GANDHINAGARA, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. (BY SRI. DIWAKAR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) …PETITIONERS - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:36077 WP No. 3137 of 2021 AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, MULTI-STORIED BUILDING, AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 01.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, PHODIUM BLOCK, 3RD FLOOR, AMBEKDAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 01.
THE PRESIDENT, KARNATAKA JUDICIAL OFFICERS (EMPLOYEES), HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, NO. 7, 1ST MAIN ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURLU - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. S. ANIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX-G AND H THE AWARD NOTICE DATED 13.01.2021 IN LAC NO.849/88-89 AND 897/88-89 AND ALSO TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO PASS THE AWARD AND TO PAY THE COMPENSATION AS PER THE DIRECTION OF THIS HONBLE COURT IN WP NO.47309/2015 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:36077 WP No. 3137 of 2021 ORAL ORDER
1. None appears for the petitioners, even when the case is called second time today.
Operative part
2. This writ petition is of the year 2021. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22 CT: BHK
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the Writ Petition is hereby dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.