Vnkat mme v. The Assistant Commissioner

Judgment

#1. i 1 its 1 t1.j,. prelimi .ct t made the t thi. ..y h aring in ‘E llowsng H c pordc’n r. . the lar, cI ‘ t r mm group thi lay the ORDER ç r th t[ I n F itio I ) t F I 1uarn PFO1 rg f tI€ F fr. I U I

1 h v d J f I J lh petiti r tlic p t t oi I un tc I I iii a UI fl9 u 1 Gov€rnrnont I J cu tion cCI€ 89 0 unta situat€d K Edthor village H F Kot Ialuk N Diutr i(t In h titin Ic C duro tun p in t h Noti d tcd 3th August 1994 oy f whiol hs bo i F d u Air N i 9 h Jr 190 I Jr(o a Ar E ti i tI F 1 F of wI 1 h I c d ly the I I v d In ir f tI ti n r f I I in uc t n b th F tit c ) a 6 $ ‘ a p a z 1a ’ a S Q p t) P 3 3 e • p . . 3 I I - 3 ‘ P — 3 7 0 T S — C 3 I 7 . I t a ) - . )a - 3 . I L ‘ ‘ • 4 a : I 1 ‘ — t f - . 4 - a C t f 7 5 0 4 - - TC P 1 - C 4 . 0 3 3 r - . 4 s I - P ) 5 a ) — U ‘ D ’ P t — . - - U ‘ • t f e - 7 . C a a p . 1 t f - f i 0 a 3 Z 1 C - c a . a 1 5 - ” C . 1 t f ’ 4 - o - . I t f ‘ S J - a - t f 7 . ) • 0 a k t - t f a U ‘ • 3 . I i L p ’ . I t f - - a s w 0 ‘ - - 0 1 - * • 0 6 a p 7 . S - a s I e - 4 0 7 a b t f a t - a p r t f 4 - S - a - U t ) 4 t C 0f t f t f . r f t f • “ 3 I t f - - 0 V C 5 - 3 C s P a - I U U ‘ 4 - p 1 ‘ , a 3 a a - t S a ’ 1 . a p t f • i 3 ‘ 7 . F C 4 0 3 r _ 7 z 0P C ( . a p 3 C t f y • U ‘ I P “ a p a 3 3 I - 7 ‘ R 0 7 I 3 C 3 • C t f 7 a ) a 0 ‘ ) 4 - ) t f — t f • j a P £ . a C - I z - S a p 0 7 7 7 ‘ 3 ‘ 1 ’ 1 i c r t • s t f a p t t f ‘ - 4 - IC - - 1 - t - 7 ( 6 3 • U • • — t - t f - * 7 • a . a - 3 . C - £ t ‘ 4 - t ‘ . - 0 P 7 . a I - I 3 . 0 t f P • - P 5 P - t t 3 ’ C Q t f - ’ I 7 . ) 0 C v - 7 ) U I ’ 1 ‘ t a - 5 a a a 7 P - e C V 0 - a p . . 3 - - 7 , - P ) 4 4 ‘ - s0 ’ c o 3 t f - o P O 7 “ ' . ‘ 7 7 0 _ _ 0 . C 7 t e - • - 3 ) . C 6 I 3 ) 3 • • — O h “ b l . P a P * a 0 3 z 0 — • - . p . a C . P U . ‘ C a p 3 C — 7 * P r - V ‘ 0 3 . e — y - c - 4 , - e P a p a ‘ z 3 o t f . U • b l - a p ‘ 0 ’ 1 ‘ . a p C O . - ‘ a p t f a p ) I - l C 7 w ’ I — ‘ a 0- 4 I No 30, Theretoi t proc cod on I he bei tt. Form No,cO ing egularisation the unauthor iced c cupat ion of be ] and i quct ion has been filed b rho pt—I itiot-

#6. Und€ 1’ bt- ircumetances, ci ncr the petitioner iS admittedly in possession of the land ic question, it is not just, fair and roasonable the respondents to dispossess the petitio fr’mm the land in questimn Form No.30 filed by tho pt tioner is di sposad of by the Comrnitte€ -iefoie, the Pot ice datod 8th August 1 )4 of whish ho pr oduoc 3 a nns r i rd the Notice 3 Led 9t h J 1 1994, f which has b en a x r E I L th 2 3 i li bl L uLh 3 In 1iht of th d i r 3 1 I iake th following 3 (i) Thc 1 3 t € 3 1 (ugust 1994, a oh r I Ia b n produod as Anneure “ and tho Not J ted 9th Juno l°4 a of whi: H h0s been prcdklccd a Annexure-B issiod b, t0e 2nd respondont are b> quac hod — t ) Thc 3ri e poni t C mni tre i dirtctd to d:epoce of rho application in Porm N r f; L h pet p v J d under tect ion 4 A of the Act an expeditioufl> d5 p :.ihld dt nv event u the mattor not II i iom thr receipt of ‘p of h u dcr

#7. In tc mc stated above. pet Sian j5 fl bead and disposed of. Rule is I - i d and nade ahobute B Sri B F Kotian, icc ned Pci rnmrnt Advoc to i s given four cooks’ t imt to file h mann of appearanoc. JUDGE J4b’ 4 pat,