SRI. G B SHIVAKUMAR v. THEJESWINI
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
- Financial Establishments Act, 2004
Judgment
SRI. G B SHIVAKUMAR S/O G A SAI BABA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/A MANIKANTHA NILAYA NEAR SURABHI KALYANA MANAPA 15TH WARD, BHARATHI NAGAR HOSPETE TALUK VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT 583201 (BY SRI. SATHISHA D J., ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR AHANA SOUHARDA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD 3RD FLOOR, MINI V V TOWER PODIUM BLOCK, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 560 001 REP BY ITS COMPETENT AUTHORITY SRI SUDARSHAN B K ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7694 WP No. 2353 of 2025
AHANA SOUHARDA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD HOSPET, VIJAYANAGAR DISTIRCT REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN SRI SATHISH S M S/O S M KOTRABASAIAH 5TH WARD, BEHIND VIVEKANANDA SCHOOL RANI PETE, HOSPITE 583201 REG. U/S 5 OF THE KARNATAKA SAUHRADA SAHAKARI ACT 1997.
NASEEMUNNISA W/O ASLAM M AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/A NO. 12TH WARD, BANGAR STREET I S R ROAD, CHITTAWADGI, HOSPTE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT 583201 (BY SRI.VEERESH R BUDIHAL., ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER IN MISC. PETITION NO. 397/2024 DATED 15/10/2024 PASSED BY THE XC1 ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR KPIDFE CASES BANGALORE AT ANNX-J. AND GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE IMPUGNED ORDER IN MISC. PETITION NO. 397/2024 DATED 15/10/2024 PASSED BY THE XC1 ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR KPIDFE CASES BANGALORE AT ANNX-J AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7694 WP No. 2353 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 20.02.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and file an appeal in terms of Section 16 of the Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004.
2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
Operative part
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed while reserving liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. If an appeal is filed, the time spent by the petitioner before this Court in this writ petition shall be taken into consideration. JT/- CT: JL Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227; Financial Establishments Act, 2004.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.