Judgment · High Court · 2006
Judgment
” I i i S I I I I i i I m - I i I S — I ) C a c I H ¶ ” 0 ’ i i i ) N - ( i - i ” n i $ i n i ( S ’ 4 ‘ > . _ S ) C n i . 0 ( 0 e S — 1 ‘ I - n i “ s i s i l f > ’ s i — - e 5 > s i ) N N j 4 4 n i 4 > s i N t ’ ) 4 N 4 4 4 s i — — ) 3 ‘ : — ‘ - ‘ x o 1 0 ( 0 t > O i c — ( 5 ( c c 4 $ 4 ‘ 4 ‘ a ’ x ) N C n i > ( 3 1 ‘ “ > N 4 N ‘ ‘ - , N ) n i N n 0i a C N S ’ N t O N 1 N N - ) 3 0 C N ( > ’ n i “ n i “ s i O N ) 3 > n S ‘ ’ 4 ‘ ) N 0 4 “ ) N ’ 5 C 1 ‘ ( ) ( N N ‘ • O N _ 4 4 3 — % 4 ‘ “ ) - ( ) ) ) N n i 4 4 4 - ” 9 n i - ” N ) N n i — , C s i C 4 4 ) N ‘ ‘ • 4 ‘ ” n i 4 4 4 a ’ O i ‘ n i , ‘ C > ) N ’ ) 4 4 n i ) N 1 N r C ) 3 0 4 0 3 1 N N ) 3 n i n i ’ 0 2 0 0 t • ( J 3 n — i ' ” ) - ’ 0 ( ) ’ 4 4 “ n i ’ 4 ” 0 ( ) n i 4 9 N O n i ‘ n i s i > 0 r f s a O N s i i - r f r f - i 4U4” H3 - 0 1 ( 4 ) ( s n i > 0 a 4 ’ n i 3 3 ! ’ i I n i P — 3 q ‘ e - 4 3 “ s i ) l . C( N E t S a ‘ N 4N O N4 C 4 4 i n nNNi i ” n i ’ C N ‘ ’ 4 4 n i ‘ “ nN NCi n i . N‘ N “ a ‘ N n i N — N N N N n i N q — N à . i N N N N c N i N N a a “ 4 : s “ i ) N N . n i r i n B n i 4 4 n i s i ) N n N i ) N N — a ‘ N ) N ’ 4 O C 4 e S ‘ ( f f 5 ) N ) N ) N C _ ‘ C N ( ’ 0 ( N ( N N I 4 4 4 “ C n i N 1 S ‘ ( t N N ( S ‘ ( 3 ( ( 4 4 ) N 0 3 ) N D S ‘ ) N C o . N C t w a C — ‘ N N 4 s i . ‘ — N “ N a ‘ ’ 4 “ N N ( e $ n ‘ i ’ 0 4 N N O 0 ( ) N 4 N r ’ n i % . - ‘ d o C ) t . . — 4 “ ) N N N 3 4 N N — i N n i N N ‘ ’ i i ’ 9 ‘ “ N n i a C C N ) N a ‘ — S “ N t ‘ N S ‘ * n i i . C N N . . a ‘ a ‘ j : N 0 ( 5 $ N - ’ 4 N n i ) N . i N N C N N — ) ) C . ‘ C . . N ‘ D C C 5 • - N N n i N C N N N s ‘ “ S ‘ a ‘ n i : — . “ 0 n i s i 5 N q - q ‘ N ( ‘ N “ 4 : • ) N a i ‘ a ‘ N ) N C N e - n e i ’ o s . . , . N N ) N . c s i , N O N ’ i C - a N n i \ i C ) N ) N ’ 4 ‘ N ‘ \ S ‘ e C 4 “ i N N ’ N N a ‘ N i i N 0 ‘ ‘ N N , N N I i I a ‘ ’ N . S . II . I ’I B . i I i i i ’ h i i i a . C ’ N ’ N e ’ N a e R l < Q 0 4 ‘ I i i L X a . i i I I I i C 1 ; & i i i i I I j I . S i I I ” i ’ I ’ f , I 1’ ; i ’ i n ; x i i L i i I I I . I I A ‘ I l P i L f I h n l j f l e f l a f ’ ” I m I n ‘ I ! L % I 01 r ’ l f 9 I a W • I ” n F ’ % y t ’ ’ I ’ ’ I ’ 0 l f m i I a i I t i j i I l i L l i l i j ! m , F e i ’ h — — i i l ‘ ” l i4i j i t J , r I L ’ r i t t i [ “ I S c — > Q i i w i a m i i S0i I • i h I i i r i ’ ’ ’ , ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ e g ’ L ’ r \ I ‘ ‘ l l a t I ‘ z • i I ‘ 1 0 I . 5 $ rU l l u l S I i I Q J x t . a • I E i I I
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.