VENKATESHACHARI v. STATE BY RAJANAKUNTE POLICE STATION
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
- Neutral citation
- 2025:KHC:11083
Outcome
Allowed
The petition is allowed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Arms Act, 1959 s. 25
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 384, 397, 504, 506(B)
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused No.1 has been granted regular bail by this Court in Crl. Pet. No.8012/2024 on 12.09.2024. The allegation of threatening the victim with deadly weapons is against accused No.1. Trial in the case is yet to…
- Para 88. The alleged offences are not punishable with death or with imprisonment for life. Though it is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner is a person with criminal antecedents, on verification it is found that the last case registered against the…
Judgment
STATE BY RAJANAKUNTE POLICE STATION, REP. BY THE SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560 001. (BY SMT.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP) …PETITIONER …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNNS), PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN S.C.NO. 10013/2024 ARISING IN (CR.NO.224/2023 DATED 18-09-2023) C.C.NO.12739/2023 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 RAJANKUNTE P.S. FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES UNDER SECTION 25 OF INDIAN ARMS ACT, AND SECTIONS 506(B), 397, 504, OF IPC, PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE 4TH ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE COURT, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AT DODDABALLAPUR. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11083 CRL.P No. 677 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER Accused No.2 in S.C.No.10013/2024 pending before the Court of IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Doddaballapura, Bengaluru Rural District, arising out of Crime No.224/2023 registered by Rajanakunte Police Station, Bengaluru for the offences punishable under Section 397, 504, 506(B) read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 25 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959 is before this Court under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking regular bail.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
FIR in Crime No.224/2023 was registered by Rajanakunte Police Station, Bengaluru against accused No.1 and petitioner herein initially for the offences punishable under Section 384, 504, 506(B) Read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 25 of India Arms Act, 1959, on the basis of the first information dated 18.09.2023 submitted by Chethan. H(CW-1).
The petitioner is said to have been arrested in the present case on 08.02.2024 and subsequently, remanded to judicial custody. His bail application filed before the Trial Court - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11083 CRL.P No. 677 of 2025 in S.C.No.10013/2024 was rejected on 30.08.2024 and therefore, he had approached this Court.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused No.1 has been granted regular bail by this Court in Crl. Pet. No.8012/2024 on 12.09.2024. The allegation of threatening the victim with deadly weapons is against accused No.1. Trial in the case is yet to commence. He submits that even if the allegations found in the first information as well as in the charge sheet is primaface presumed to be true, the alleged offence punishable under Section 397 of IPC cannot be made out against the accused. Accordingly, he prays to allow the petition.
Per contra, learned HCGP has opposed the petition. She submits that the petitioner is a person with criminal antecedents and therefore, his prayer needs to be rejected.
Allegations against accused No.1 and the petitioner herein is that on 18.09.2023 at about 6.45 pm., they had entered into a Bar and Restaurant situated at Hesaraghata, Yelahanka Taluk, wherein the first informant was working as a cashier and demanded to give them beer bottles. When the first - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:11083 CRL.P No. 677 of 2025 informant asked for money, they allegedly threatened him with a long and when first informant’s friend Prajwal came to his rescue, the accused persons threatened him. At that time, some other customers entered the Bar and Restaurant and the accused persons ran out.
Operative part
The alleged offences are not punishable with death or with imprisonment for life. Though it is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner is a person with criminal antecedents, on verification it is found that the last case registered against the petitioner was in the year 2016. Undisputedly, in all the cases registered against the petitioner earlier, he has been granted bail. Accused No.1 has been enlarged on bail in Crl. Pet. No.8012/2024 on 12.09.2024. The trial in this case is yet to commence. Under the circumstances, I am of the opinion that the prayer made by the petitioner for grant of regular bail is required to be answered affirmatively. Accordingly, the following:- ORDER The petition is allowed. - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:11083 CRL.P No. 677 of 2025 The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in S.C.No.10013/2024 pending before the Court of IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Doddaballapura, Bengaluru Rural District, arising out of Crime No.224/2023 registered by Rajanakunte Police Station, Bengaluru the offences punishable under Sections 397, 504, 506(B) read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 25 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959, subject to the following conditions: a) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two sureties for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court; b) The petitioner shall appear regularly on all the dates of hearing before the Trial Court unless the Trial Court exempts his appearance for valid reasons; c) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses; d) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without permission of - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:11083 CRL.P No. 677 of 2025 the said Court until the case registered against him is disposed off. SD/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE BN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Arms Act, 1959 — s. 25; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 384, 397, 504, 506(B).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.