Karnataka State Road Transport v. D.L. Huchegowda
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. After negotiations, the parties have arrived at settlement. Accordingly, both the parties have filed a Joint Memo duly signed before the Lok Adalath. The said Joint Memo reads as follows : “The petitioner – KSRTC has agreed to reinstate the workman into service without…
- Para 33. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo modifying the Award dated 16.06.2016 passed by the Presiding Officer, C/c Labour Court, Mysuru in Ref. No. 08/2016 vide Annexure ‘G’. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv* 4 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES…
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA & SRI. P.D. SUBRAMANYA, MEMBER W.P.No.8180/2017 (LK) (Lok Adalath No. 687/2024) BETWEEN: Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Mandya Division, By its Divisional Controller, Represented by its Chief Law Officer. ...PETITIONER (BY SMT. H.R. RENUKA, ADVOCATE) AND: D.L. Huchegowda S/o D.L. Lakshmanagowda, Adult, R/o Devalapura, Nagamangala Taluk, Mandya District – 570 023. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. L. SHEKAR, ADVOCATE ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2 AWARD DATED 16.06.2016 IN REF NO. 08/2016 PASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, C/C LABOUR COURT, MYSURU VIDE ANNEXURE ‘G’. THE PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER PASSED: IS CONCILIATION ORDER In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the Award dated
16.06.2016 passed by the Presiding Officer, C/c Labour Court, Mysuru in Ref. No. 08/2016 vide Annexure ‘G’.
#2. After negotiations, the parties have arrived at settlement. Accordingly, both the parties have filed a Joint Memo duly signed before the Lok Adalath. The said Joint Memo reads as follows : “The petitioner – KSRTC has agreed to reinstate the workman into service without backwages from the date of dismissal till the date of actual reinstatement. The consequential benefits and continuity of service will be extended to the workman. The respondent – workman has agreed to give-up 75% backwages awarded by the Labour Court, if he is extended continuity of service and consequential benefits”. 3
#3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo modifying the Award dated 16.06.2016 passed by the Presiding Officer, C/c Labour Court, Mysuru in Ref. No. 08/2016 vide Annexure ‘G’. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv* 4 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE,BENGALURU BEFORE THE HIGH COURT LOK ADALAT WP. NO. 8180/2017 (LOK ADALATH NO. 687/2024) FILED BEFORE LOK ADALAT BETWEEN: KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ... Petitioner AND: D.L HUCHEGOWDA ... Respondent JOINT MEMO The WP filed against the award in Ref. No.8/2016 Dated 16.06.2016 on the file of the Presiding Officer, C/C Labour Court, Mysuru, has been settled between the parties on the following terms and the award may kindly be modified as under: “The petitioner – KSRTC has agreed to reinstate the workman into service without backwages from the date of dismissal till the date of actual reinstatement. The consequential benefits and continuity of service will be extended to the workman. The respondent – workman has agreed to give-up 75% backwages awarded by the Labour Court, if he is extended continuity of service and consequential benefits”. The parties to this petition have set their hands to this settlement before the Lok Adalat in the presence of Conciliators on this 01/02/2024 at Bengaluru Bench. SIGNATURE OF PETITIONER SIGNATURE OF RESPONDENT Sd/- ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER ADVOCATE FOR REPONDENT Sd/- Sd/-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.