✦ Karnataka High Court

(BY SRI. HARIPRASAD M B.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT) ) v. (BY SRI. BASAVAIAH C.,ADVOCATE)

Writ Petition No. 1079 of 2022R DEVDAS

Case at a glance

Bench
R DEVDAS
Neutral citation
2024:KHC:35047

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of for the reasons stated above. DL Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE

Judgment

1. SRI SANNASHETTY S/O KEMPA SHETTY AGED 60 YEARS

2. MAHADEVAMMA W/O SRI SANNASHETTY AGED 50 YEARS

3. SHIVAKUMAR S/O SANNASHETTY AGED 33 YEARS THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ALL ARE R/AT KADUKOTHANALLI VILLAGE C A KERE HOBLI MADDUR TQ MANDYA DIST 571478. (BY SRI. HARIPRASAD M B.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT) ) …PETITIONERS AND:

1.

SRI K M NAGARAJU S/O SRI K M MADAIAH @ TAILOR SOMANNA AGED 50 YEARS R/AT KADUKOTHANALLI VILLAGE C A KERE HOBLI MADDUR TQ MANDYA DIST 571478. (BY SRI. BASAVAIAH C.,ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:35047 WP No. 1079 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 22.12.2021 PASSED IN EXECUTION CASE NO.89/2018, ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT AT MADDUR AT ANNEXURE-L; DIRECT TO HALT THE OPERATION OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER REFRAINING FROM ATTACHING THE IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES OWNED AND POSSESSED BY PETITIONERS REFRAINING THE RESPONDENT FROM INTERFERING WITH THE PEACEFUL POSSESSION AND ENJOYMENT OF THE PETITIONERS OVER THE LAND IN QUESTION, TILL DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioners.

2.

It appears that the execution case from out of which the present writ petition arises viz., Ex.No.89/2018 has been closed on 21.03.2023 and therefore, the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous.

3.

Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of for the reasons stated above. DL Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1079 of 2022). ← Search more judgments