(BY SRI. HARIPRASAD M B.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT) ) v. (BY SRI. BASAVAIAH C.,ADVOCATE)
Case at a glance
- Bench
- R DEVDAS
- Neutral citation
- 2024:KHC:35047
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of for the reasons stated above. DL Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
Judgment
1. SRI SANNASHETTY S/O KEMPA SHETTY AGED 60 YEARS
2. MAHADEVAMMA W/O SRI SANNASHETTY AGED 50 YEARS
3. SHIVAKUMAR S/O SANNASHETTY AGED 33 YEARS THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ALL ARE R/AT KADUKOTHANALLI VILLAGE C A KERE HOBLI MADDUR TQ MANDYA DIST 571478. (BY SRI. HARIPRASAD M B.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT) ) …PETITIONERS AND:
SRI K M NAGARAJU S/O SRI K M MADAIAH @ TAILOR SOMANNA AGED 50 YEARS R/AT KADUKOTHANALLI VILLAGE C A KERE HOBLI MADDUR TQ MANDYA DIST 571478. (BY SRI. BASAVAIAH C.,ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:35047 WP No. 1079 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 22.12.2021 PASSED IN EXECUTION CASE NO.89/2018, ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT AT MADDUR AT ANNEXURE-L; DIRECT TO HALT THE OPERATION OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER REFRAINING FROM ATTACHING THE IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES OWNED AND POSSESSED BY PETITIONERS REFRAINING THE RESPONDENT FROM INTERFERING WITH THE PEACEFUL POSSESSION AND ENJOYMENT OF THE PETITIONERS OVER THE LAND IN QUESTION, TILL DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioners.
It appears that the execution case from out of which the present writ petition arises viz., Ex.No.89/2018 has been closed on 21.03.2023 and therefore, the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous.
Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of for the reasons stated above. DL Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.