✦ Karnataka High Court

PUSHKAR KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Criminal Petition No. 490 of 2022M G UMA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2

Judgment

2. MR. SHASHANKAR KUMAR MISHRA, S/O LATE JANARDAN MISHRA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHYAM BHAVAN, NEAR DURGA TEMPLE, MANIKPUR, BHAGALPUR, BIHAR - 812 005.

3. MRS. MANDWI DEVI, W/O SHANKAR KUMAR MISHRA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHYAM BHAVAN, NEAR DURGA TEMPLE, MANIKPUR, BHAGALPUR, BIHAR - 812 005.

4. PADMAJA BHARTI, D/O MR. SHANKAR KUMAR MISHRA, Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:48656 CRL.P No. 490 of 2022 AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHYAM BHAVAN, NEAR DURGA TEMPLE, MANIKPUR, BHAGALPUR, BIHAR - 812 005.

5. PUSHPITA MISHRA, D/O.MR.SHANKAR KUMAR MISHRA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHYAM BHAVAN, NEAR DURGA TEMPLE, MANIKPUR, BHAGALPUR, BIHAR - 812 005.

6. PRIYANKA MISHRA, W/O SHANKAR KUMAR MISHRAT, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT BUILDING 56, FLAT NO.102, 5TH A CROSS, RAJASHREE LAYOUT, MUNNEKOLALA, BANGALORE - 560 037. (BY SRI. KAPIL DIXIT., ADVOCATE) AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA, MARATHAHALLI POLICE STATINO, MARATHAHALLI SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 037.

2.

SMT. RUHI MISHRA, W/O PUSHKAR KUMAR MISHRA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.27, …PETITIONERS - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:48656 CRL.P No. 490 of 2022 1ST FLOOR, 3A CROSS, RAJESHRI LAYOUT, MUNNEKOLAL, BENGALURU - 560 037. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.RAJAT SUBRAMANYAM, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR PENDING AGAINST THE PETITIONER BEARING CR.NO.218/2019 IN C.C.NO.52172/2021 PENDING BEFORE THE XXIX ACMM, BANGALORE (MAYO HALL) FILED BY THE 2nd RESPONDENT U/S 498A R/W 34 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking leave of the court to withdraw the petition.

2. Memo is accepted.

Operative part

3.

Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Petition No. 490 of 2022). ← Search more judgments