SRI. LEX NEXUS, ADVOCATE'S) v. CHIKKABALLAPUR-562 101
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S G PANDIT
- Neutral citation
- 2025:KHC:7320
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed off
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
(BY SRI. SATHVIK M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. LEX NEXUS, ADVOCATE'S) …PETITIONER AND: Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
BENGALURU NORTH UNIVERSITY TAMAKA, KOLAR-563 103, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR
THE CHANCELLOR BENGALURU NORTH UNIVERSITY, TAMAKA, KOLAR-563 103. - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7320 WP No. 1204 of 2021
DR. C.M. LEELAVATHI UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, HONNENAHALLI, BENGALURU-HYDERABAD HWY, CHIKKABALLAPUR-562 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.P.RAJENDRA KUMAR SUNGAY, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 - SERVED; R3 - V/O/D 17.11.2021, H/S) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-C ISSUED BY THE R-2 DATED 18.12.2020 NOMINATING THE R-3 AS THE DEAN OF THE FACULTY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OF THE R-1 AND FURTHER DIRECT THE R-1 AND 2 IN PERMITTING THE PETITIONER TO ACT AS THE DEAN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE EDUCATION OF THE R-1 UNIVERSITY IN TERMS OF SECTION 21(1) OF THE KARNATAKA STATE UNIVERSITIES ACT, 2000 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7320 WP No. 1204 of 2021 ORAL ORDER Heard Sri. Sathvik.M., learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. T.P.Rajendra Kumar Sungay, learned counsel for respondent No.1. Perused the writ petition papers.
2. The petitioner is before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning Annexure-C bearing No.¨ÉA.G.««/².¤.rÃ/1598/2020-21 dated 18.12.2020, by which the 3rd respondent was nominated as Dean of the Department of Education of respondent No.1-University.
3. A perusal of the impugned Notification dated
Operative part
18.12.2020 (Annexure-C) indicates that respondent No.3 nominated as Dean for a period of two years from 18.12.2020 and two years period has come to an end on 17.12.2022. As the term of the Dean has come to an end on 17.12.2022, the present writ petition would no more survive consideration. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed off
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.