Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly the writ petitions are hereby disposed off
Judgment
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL M ANAGER AND DISCIPLINARY AUTHOR TY LE() SHOPPING COMPLEX 4T4 RESIDI NC R() \D CkGS BANGALORE 560 025
D.ISTR.1C1.’ CASTE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE BANGAI ORE URBAN DISTRICT B’i ITS DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER ANI) \IE’iBER SI CRET BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT 16111 CROSS. 4° MAiN ROAD SAMPANG1RAMANAGAR BANGALORE 560 027.
Bv Sri. E S INDIRESH. ADV. FOR R I Sri. C JAGADEES[-I. ADV.. FOR R-2) RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETJTIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITU flON OF INDIA VvIEH A PRAYER TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 0601 2012 ‘ IDF ANNEL\RF F ISSEED \CAIMT THE PFIITIONER B’i RESPONDENT No. 2 AND ETC. THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING PRELIMINARY HEARING B GROUP I HIS PASSED THE FOLLOW.ING; ON FOR THE COURT ORDER In til.ese. wr 1. pa tltiOflS tite pe.tlI.jom.rs have prayed hat a writ. i.n the nature of certi.orari to quash the notice dated 060 1 P2.0 12 Annexure P and the order of suspension datei.1 2io01 *2012 Annexure F. 3
2. Petitioner was an employee of respondent No.1 Company. On receipt of a complaint that petitioner by producing false caste certificate claimed employment, the respondent No.1 Company referred the matter to the Caste Verification Committee constituted at the State level and they in turn issued the impugned notice as per Annexure 13. It is settled legal position that for the caste certificates issued prior to 1993 ft is the State Committee constituted for that purpose under the Government Order dated 06.05.2009 to enquire into the matter. Accordingly the State Caste Verification Committee has now issued the impugned notice - Annexure B and I find no justifiable ground to interfere with the same.
Further the petitioner has not made the Caste Verification Committee who has issued the impugned notice as a party to these proceedings.
Second prayer in these petitions is to quash the order of suspension dated 20.01.2012 — Annexure F. Learned counsel for the 4 petitioner submits that petitioner retired from service on attaining the age of suspension on 31.01.2012. Therefore the impugned order of suspension — Annexure F has now merged with the order of superannuation. Therefore the question of quashing the order of suspension at Annexure F will not survive for consideration.
Operative part
4. Accordingly the writ petitions are hereby disposed off. All contentions urged by the petitioner in these writ petitions are kept open. Ordered accordingly.. Sd/ JUDGE LRS/250520! 2.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.