✦ Karnataka High Court

SMT. LALITHAMMA N v. SRI ABDUL JABBAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

If needful is not done, the writ petition stands dismissed without

Provisions considered

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.2096/2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN 1 . SMT. LALITHAMMA N W/O H.K.RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS PROPRIETOR OF STERLING AND SKYLINE THEATRE INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, VIDYARANYAPURAM, MYSORE-570008. (PETITIONER HAS NOT CLAIMED ANY SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFITS) (BY SRI./SMT.: SUMANA BALIGA M, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER/S AND 1 . SRI ABDUL JABBAR S/O MOHAMMAD GAIB SAHEB AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS NO.863, NARAYANA SHASTRI RAOD, CHAMARAJA MOHALLA, MYSORE-570008. (BY SRI./SMT.:CP 3114/2019 S.A.MARUTHI PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR CAVEATOR/RESPONDENT) …RESPONDENT/S THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING ANNEXURE-A DATED 02.12.2019 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL. 2 W.P.NO.2096/2020 SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MYSORE IN EX.754/2013 ON I.A. NO.12 U/O 21 RULE 29 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC. AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER. CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER (PER: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) Two weeks time is granted to do the needful. If needful is not done, the writ petition stands dismissed without reference to the Court. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE TYPED BY : SK CASE WORKER : JK COMPARED BY : JK Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: If needful is not done, the writ petition stands dismissed without

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151; Constitution of India — art. 227.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments