M/S SAJJAN SUPER BAZAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
has been complied with, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 11, 12
Judgment
REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SHRI SUNIL KUMAR V SAJJAN SY NO. D29, SHOP NO.145,146,147 JEWARGI, JEWARGI MAIN ROAD KALABURAGI KARNATAKA - 585 310 (BY SRI. KEERTHI PRASAD D C, ADVOCATE) …COMPLAINANT Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY VIKASA SOUDHA SAMPANGIRAMANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 001 ...PRO FORMA RESPONDENT
SRI. RAVINDRA P.N. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DISTRICT OFFICES COMPLEX SHIDLAGHATTA ROAD - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:21339-DB CCC No. 4 of 2025 HC-KAR CHIKKABALLAPURA KARNATAKA - 562 101
SRI. PRAKASH G.T. NITTALLI CHIEF EXECUTING OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYAT ZILLA PANCHAYAT BHAVANA SHIDLAGHATTA ROAD CHIKKABALLAPURA KARNATAKA - 562 101
SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA DISTRICT OFFICER DEPARTMENT FOR WELFARE OF BACKWARD CLASSES DISTRICT OFFICES COMPLEX No.SB-4, 2ND FLOOR SHIDLAGHATTA ROAD CHIKKABALLAPURA KARNATAKA - 562 101 (SRI. NAVEEN CHANDRAHSEKAR, AGA FOR RESPONDENT No.1, ACCUSED Nos.2 AND 4 SRI M.S. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR ACCUSED No.3) …ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTION AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW SINCE THEY HAVE WILLFULLY DISOBEYED AND VIOLATED THE ORDER DATED 09.12.2024 PASSED IN WP NO.30781/2024, VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:21339-DB CCC No. 4 of 2025 HC-KAR CORAM: HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The learned counsel for the complainant states as the order has been complied with, he shall withdraw the contempt petition.
Operative part
2. In view of the statement made and the fact that the order has been complied with, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V KAMESWAR RAO) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE AHB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: has been complied with, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 11, 12.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.