MR. C.K. RAVI v. SRI VISHWANATH V.R
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 11, 12
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in this complaint. The same is accordingly closed. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE KS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 3 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1. MR. C.K. RAVI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS SON OF LATE C.S. KALYANA NAIK RESIDING AT CHIKKATOREPALYA TAGACHAGUPPE DHAKLE BACHENAHATTI POST KASABA HOBLI MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 159. (BY SRI B.R. VISWANATH, ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI VISHWANATH V.R. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 3RD FLOOR, ROOM No.405 NEW DISTRICT OFFICE COMPLEX RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA - 562 159. Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: High Court of Karnataka …COMPLAINANT
SMT. KRISHNAVENI B.V. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:29075-DB CCC No. 3 of 2025 HC-KAR (LAND ACQUISITION) KARNATAKA STATE HIGHWAYS PLANNING AUTHORITY K.R. CIRCLE BENGALURU - 560 001.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGLURU - 560 001. …ACCUSED (BY SRI NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR, AGA) …PRO FORMA RESPONDENT THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO INITIATE ACTION FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR DISOBEYING THE ORDERS DATED 08.11.2024 PASSED IN W.P.NO.15271/2023 AND PASS SUCH OTHER FURTHER ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:29075-DB CCC No. 3 of 2025 HC-KAR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU ,CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU,CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The complainant has filed the present contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 08.11.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby Accused Nos.4 and 5 were directed to consider the complainant's representation dated 15.05.2021.
2. The accused have filed an affidavit of compliance, inter alia stating that the representation of the complainant has been considered.
3. The learned Additional Government Advocate has also filed a memo, the relevant portion of which clearly states as under: "9. I further state that in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the Endorsement has been issued by the Special Land Acquisition Officer on
02.12.2024 duly in accordance with law to the representation dated 15.05.2021 submitted by the - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:29075-DB CCC No. 3 of 2025 HC-KAR petitioner respect of Survey No.19 of Tagachaguppe Village, Ramanagara District and the said endorsement has been communicated to the Petitioner on 06.12.2024."
In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in this complaint. The same is accordingly closed. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE KS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.