Contempt Petition No. 2 of 2025 · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, this petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 11, 12
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V KAMESWAR RAO) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 THE HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE PRESENT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 2 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI VENKATESHA H D, S/O. LATE SRI. DODDANNA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. HULIBELE VILLAGE, HORALAGALLU POST, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. (BY SRI RAJU S, ADVOCATE) AND:
G. MANJUNATH, …COMPLAINANT Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA S/O. FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE COMPLAINANT, MAJOR, TAHSILDAR, KANAKAPURA TALUK, KANAKAPURA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. …ACCUSED NO.1
STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (LAND GRANTS), REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-1. …PRO FORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKHAR, AGA FOR ACCUSED NO.1 & PROFORMA RESPONDENT) - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:20213-DB CCC No. 2 of 2025 HC-KAR THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO TAKE THE COGNIZANCE AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND PUNISH HIM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW IN VIEW OF HIS DELIBERATE DISRESPECT INTENTION SHOWN TOWARDS THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 04.09.2024 PASSED IN WP NO.17074/2024 (KLR-RR/SUR). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Learned AGA states that entries in the RTCs have been effected.
2. Learned counsel for the complainant seeks to withdraw the contempt petition.
Operative part
In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V KAMESWAR RAO) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, this petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 11, 12.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.