SMT SWETHA BAI v. MOTHER SMT. SWETHA BAI
Case at a glance
- Bench
- C M JOSHI
Outcome
Dismissed
appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Key paragraphs
- Para 22 . SRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED SRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560010 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER. …Respondents This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated 01.08.2022 passed in MVC No.26/2013 on the file of the…
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. JOSHI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 248 OF 2024 BETWEEN 1 . SMT SWETHA BAI W/O LATE TAGORE BABU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 2 . KUMARI RAGINI TAGORE D/O LATE TAGORE BABU, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, 3 . RANJITH SINGH S/O LATE TAGORE BABU, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, 4 . 5 . SRI. KRISHNA SINGH S/O LATE RAM SINGH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, SMT. MOUNA BAI W/O KRISHNA SINGH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, THE APPELLANT NOS.2 AND 3 ARE MINORS, REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER SMT. SWETHA BAI, THE APPELLANT NO.1 HEREIN, ALL ARE R/AT WARD NO.16, GANDHINAGAR, OOLAVADI ROAD, MFA.No.248/2024 -------------------------- 2 CHINTHAMANI TOWN-563125 CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT. …Appellants (By SRIYUTHS:K.VISHWANATHA & T.V.NANJEGOWDA, Advocates) AND:
DORIGALU SRINIVASALU S/O NARASIMHALU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OWNER OF THE VEHICLE BEARING REG NO. AP-02-Y-4059 R/AT MUDIGUBBA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPURA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
Operative part
SRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED SRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560010 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER. …Respondents This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated 01.08.2022 passed in MVC No.26/2013 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Chintamani, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: MFA.No.248/2024 -------------------------- 3 ORAL ORDER If the office objections are not complied within four weeks, appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dt.18.07.2025 not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : MK R By : RM C By : STE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.