THUNGAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
- Neutral citation
- 2025:KHC:683
Outcome
Dismissed
Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 482
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 s. 190
- Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 ss. 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v)
Judgment
(BY SRI. SANDESH T B, ADVOCATE) AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RIPPONPET POLICE STATION SHIVAMOGGA REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:683 CRL.P No. 177 of 2025
SMT. SUMITRA W/O MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT MADVALLI, K.HUNASAVALLI VILLAGE, HOSANAGAR TALUK, SHIMOGGA DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.ASMA KOUSER, ADDITIONAL SPP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.438 (FILED U/S.482 BNSS) CR.P.C PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND GRANT THE RELIFE OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN THE EVENT OF ARREST IN CRIME NO.121/2024 U/S.107,352 R/W SEC.190 OF BNS AND U/S.3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT 2015 OF THE RIPPONPET POLICE STATION, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT, SHIVAMOGGA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioners has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the petition.
2. Memo is placed on record. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file a criminal appeal, as requested. DR, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6 SD/- (MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 190; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — ss. 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.