SRI D BALASUNDHRAM v. JASON VON HOONG CHEW
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
that view of the matter, petition is dismissed as having
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Since there is no dispute of the matter having been settled, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, no point in keeping this matter pending. In that view of the matter, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL)…
Judgment
1. SRI D BALASUNDHRAM S/O DORAISWAMY AGE : 84 YEARS
2. SMT. B A SHRIVYSHNAVI D/O D BALASUNDHRAM AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.15 G.D.STREET RACE COURSE COIMBATORE-641 018. Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
3. M/S REALTO INDIA PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.15 G.D. STREET RACE COURS COIMBATORE - 641 018. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KIRAN S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VINOD S.,ADVOCATE) AND:
JASON VON HOONG CHEW FATHER'S NAME: KONG HOI CHEW - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10702 WP No. 6693 of 2017 AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, DIRECTOR OF METROCORP INFRASTRUCTURE LTD R/AT #18-02, SINGAPORE SINGAPORE-248 362.
MR.SURENDER SINGH S/O OMPAL SINGH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, DIRECTOR OF METROCORP INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., RESIDING AT NO.VPO, NEOLA THE JHAJJAR DISRICT, JHAJJAR HARYANA-124 103 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SANDEEP JAISHANKAR.,ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SANKEERTH VITTAL., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ADMIT THE ABOVE PETITION AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD
07.01.2017 PASSED ON I.A.NO.2 IN O.S.NO.940/2013 BY THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, AT DEVANAHALLI AT ANNEX-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10702 WP No. 6693 of 2017 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the parties submits that the matter has been settled before the Lok Adalth on
14.12.2024.
2. Though, Sri. Kiran S. learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri. Vinod. S, learned counsel for the petitioner admits the same. He submits that there is another connected matter pending and that he would file a memo for withdrawal of the present petition given a week's time.
Operative part
Since there is no dispute of the matter having been settled, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, no point in keeping this matter pending. In that view of the matter, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: that view of the matter, petition is dismissed as having
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.