SRI NIRANJAN v. SMT REKHA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, Appeal stands dismissed
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Key paragraphs
- Para 11 . SMT REKHA WIFE OF LATE B.K. CHANDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 2 . KUMARI LAVANYA D/O LATE. B.K. CHANDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS 3 . VINAYA RAGHAVENDRA SON OF LATE B.K. CHANDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS RESPONDENTS 1, 2 AND 3 ARE RESIDING…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 605 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI NIRANJAN AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESIDENT OF NELAGULI VILLAGE UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE. (By SRIYUTHS. M. MUNIGANGAPPA, GANASHEKARA G., ADVOCATES) ..APPELLANT AND:
Operative part
SMT REKHA WIFE OF LATE B.K. CHANDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 2 . KUMARI LAVANYA D/O LATE. B.K. CHANDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS 3 . VINAYA RAGHAVENDRA SON OF LATE B.K. CHANDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS RESPONDENTS 1, 2 AND 3 ARE RESIDING AT BYRAMANGALA VILLAGE & POST, MFA No. 605/2024 ---------------------------- BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT. 2 4 . ASHOKA SON OF MUDDAPPA MAJOR IN AGE RESIDENT OF NELAGULI VILLAGE UTTARAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE. ..RESPONDENTS This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 173(1) of MV ACT, against the Judgment and Award dated 01.12.2022 passed in M.V.C. No.395/2018, on the file of the PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MEMBER, ADDITIONAL MACT, RAMANAGARA awarding compensation of Rs.36,20,400/- with interest at 6 percent p.a. from the date of petition till the date of deposit. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Three weeks time is granted to comply with office objections, failing which the above appeal shall automatically stand dismissed without further orders from the Court. Sd/- JUDGE MFA No. 605/2024 ---------------------------- NOTE: Court Order dated. 20.01.2025, not complied with. 3 Hence, Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- I/C ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: AR R By: UN C By: YL
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, Appeal stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.