✦ Karnataka High Court

(BY SRI. SUBRAMANI M A., ADVOCATE) v. (BY SRI.B.RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1 & R2)

Writ Petition No. 114 of 2025KRISHNA S DIXIT, RAMACHANDRA D HUDDAR2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
KRISHNA S DIXIT, RAMACHANDRA D HUDDAR
Neutral citation
2025:KHC:14853-DB

Outcome

Disposed of

In view of the above, writ petition is disposed off as

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. SRI JANARDHANA N, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, AGED MAJOR, WORKING AS REVENUE INSPECTOR, CHANNARYAPATNA HOBLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN-562 110. (BY SRI.B.RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1 & R2) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO…

Judgment

SRI N S SHIVAPRASAD S/O. N.S. SHANTHAKUMAR N.S, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS WORKING AS REVENUE INSPECTOR, KASABA-2, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, R/AT NO.81, 1ST A MAIN ROAD, SADASHIVANAGAR, NELAMANGALA TOWN, BENGALURU RURAL PIN-562 123. (BY SRI. SUBRAMANI M A., ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER Location: High Court of Karnataka AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S BUILDING, BENGALURUR-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

2.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN-562 110. - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14853-DB WP No. 114 of 2025

3.

SRI JANARDHANA N, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, AGED MAJOR, WORKING AS REVENUE INSPECTOR, CHANNARYAPATNA HOBLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN-562 110. (BY SRI.B.RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1 & R2) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO QUASH ORDER DATED 19/12/2024 PASSED NY THE HONBLE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN APPLICATION NO.4528/2024 (ANNEXURE-A) AND CONSEQUENTLY, ALLOW APPLICATION NO.4528/2024 ON THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BENGALUR. KARNATAKA FILE OF HONBLE THE THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the posting having been given to the petitioner, the matter does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, he has filed a memo, which reads as under: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14853-DB WP No. 114 of 2025 "The petitioner humbly prays that the prayer made in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the Petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the above writ petition in the interest of justice and equity".

Operative part

2. The learned AGA appearing for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 has no objection for granting leave to withdraw the petition. In view of the above, writ petition is disposed off as having been withdrawn. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, writ petition is disposed off as

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 114 of 2025). ← Search more judgments