M/S SRI. MANIKANTA TRADERS v. M/S. CANARA BANK
Case at a glance
- Bench
- E S INDIRESH
- Neutral citation
- 2025:KHC:41345
Outcome
Disposed of
writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking into consideration the averments made in the writ petition, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the respondent-Bank is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22nd December, 2022…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.258 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S SRI. MANIKANTA TRADERS REP. BY ITS PROPRIETORIX SMT. SRIDEVI G.S., W/O ARUN L., AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NO.48, 3RD ROAD RAILWAY MEN COLONY L.G. HALLI, RMV 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 094. (BY SMT. KAVITHA D., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. CANARA BANK REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, SARAKKI LAYOUT BRANCH, NO.727, 46TH CROSS, 8TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, SARAKKI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 070. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTCLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT-BANK TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION LETTER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 22ND DECEMBER, 2022 FILED FOR CONVERSION OF OVERDRAFT ACCOUNT TO TERM LOAN VIDE ANNEXURE-D; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:41345 WP NO.258 OF 2023 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent-Bank to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22nd December, 2022 (Annexure-D) filed for conversion of Overdraft Account into Term loan.
Heard Smt. Kavitha D., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Vignesh Shetty, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank.
Operative part
Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking into consideration the averments made in the writ petition, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the respondent-Bank is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22nd December, 2022 (Annexure-D) in accordance with law within an outer limit of four months from the date of receipt of this order. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.