✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI. M.C. VENKATARANGAIAH v. SRI. M.V. VENKATESH

DB W.A No. 46 of 2023ANU SIVARAMAN, VIJAYKUMAR A PATIL2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

In view of the said memo, appeal is dismissed as

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT APPEAL NO.46/2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. M.C. VENKATARANGAIAH S/O LATE CHANNAGIRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/OF MADIKENNASANDRA KOTHAGERE HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT. ARSHIFA BAHAR KHANAM Location: High Court Of Karnataka (BY SRI. NAGARAJ D, ADV.,) AND: …APPELLANT

1.

SRI. M.V. VENKATESH S/O SRI. M.C. VENKATARANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/OF MADIKENNASANDRA KOTHAGERE HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT.

2.

SRI. M.V. RANGANATH S/O SRI. M.C. VENKATARANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS GOVERNMENT DOCTOR SIRA GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL SIRA, TUMKUR DISTRICT. - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:48789-DB W.A. No.46/2023 HC-KAR

3.

SRI. M.V. NAGARAJ S/O SRI. M.C. VENKATARANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS JANATA CO-OPERATIVE BANK VIJAYANAGARA CLUB VIJAYANAGARA, BANGALORE.

4.

SRI. M.C. RANGASWAMY S/O LATE CHANNAGIRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/OF. MADIKENNASANDRA KOTHAGERE HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT.

5.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MAINTENANCE TRIBUNAL TUMKUR SUB-DIVISION TUMKUR-572101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA FOR R5 R1 TO R3 ARE SERVED NOTICE NOT ORDERED IN R/O R4) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED

21.11.2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP No.65255/2016 (GM-RES) IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE OPERATIVE PORTION AT SL.No.2 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:48789-DB W.A. No.46/2023 HC-KAR ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) The personal presence of the appellant is taken note of.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 25.11.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal.

3. Memo reads as under: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The Appellant most respectfully submits that, as his three sons are taking care of him, the Appellant has been advised to withdraw the above appeal, and accordingly, the Appellant is seeking permission to withdraw the appeal, and the same may be kindly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to take such legal proceedings if the need arises in the interest of justice and equity. "

3. Memo is placed on record.

Operative part

4. In view of the said memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to initiate such action as is permissible in law. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. DB W.A No. 46 of 2023). ← Search more judgments