✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI. S. SURESH v. SRI. C. SURESH

Criminal Revision Petition No. 11 of 2024H P SANDESH2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

petition is disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. In terms of the compromise, the criminal revision petition is disposed of. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29

Judgment

1. SRI. S. SURESH, S/O SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC: ASSISTANT TEACHER, GOVERNMENT HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL, HONANAHALLI VILLAGE, SALIGRAMA HOBLI, K.R. NAGAR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571 602. (BY SRI. PRAKASH M. PATIL, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:

1.

SRI. C. SURESH, S/O LATE C.G. CHANDREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/At BANNIMANTAP EXTENSION, K.R. NAGARA TOWN, MYSURU DISTRICT-571 602. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. B.S. MAHENDRA, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.45/2022 DATED 13.10.2023 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, PASSED BY THE VIII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU, SITTING AT HUNSUR AND THEREBY CONFIRMING THE - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4601 CRL.RP No. 11 of 2024 CONVICTION AND SENTENCE THAT THE PETITIONER TO PAY A FINE OF RS.1,10,000/- IN DEFAULT TO PAY THE FINE AMOUNT TO UNDERGO SIMPLE IMPRISONMENT FOR 1 YEAR IN C.C.NO.259/2018 DATED 03.01.2022 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJNAGAR AND ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent are present before the Court. The petitioner has filed an application under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (‘the NI Act’ for short) for compounding of the offence. The parties have settled the matter for an amount of Rs.94,000/- in total. An amount of Rs.44,000/- is already in deposit before the Trial Court. Now the petitioner has made the payment of Rs.60,000/- before the Court and the same is acknowledged by the learned counsel for the respondent. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that out of Rs.44,000/- which is in deposit before the Trial Court, the Trial Court can deduct an amount of Rs.10,000/- towards fine as imposed by the Trial Court and the remaining amount of Rs.34,000/- shall be released in favour of the complainant/respondent. Hence, the Trial Court is directed to - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4601 CRL.RP No. 11 of 2024 release the amount of Rs.34,000/- favour of complainant/respondent, on proper identification. The remaining amount of Rs.10,000/- shall vest with the State as fine.

2.

In view of the settlement arrived between the parties, the application filed under Section 147 of the NI Act is allowed and the offence is compounded. Consequently, the petitioner is acquitted for the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act.

Operative part

3.

In terms of the compromise, the criminal revision petition is disposed of. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — ss. 138, 147.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Revision Petition No. 11 of 2024). ← Search more judgments