B. NAVEEN v. SMT. P. INDRAMMA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
this petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 281 OF 2019 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
B. NAVEEN S/O. KARIBASAPPA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
NAGARAJ S/O. KARIBASAPPA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
KARIBASAPPA S/O. KOTRAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
ANNAKKA W/O. KARIBASAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
KRISHNAJI S/O. KOTRAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, PETITIONERS 1 TO 5 ARE R/O. NITTUR VILLAGE, HARAPANAHALLI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-583131
VEERENDRA S/O. MALLESHAPPA OLEKAR, AGE: MAJOR, R/O. AREMALLAPURA, RANEBENNUR TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT - 581115
NAGARAJA S/O. FAKEERAPPA - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:19310 CRL.P No. 281 of 2019 HC-KAR AGE: MAJOR, R/O. AREMALLAPURA RANEBENNUR TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT-581115
SURESH S/O. BANAKAR NAGAPPA AGE: MAJOR, R/O. PAMENAHALLI VILLAGE HARIHARA TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577601 (BY SRI. S.G. RAJENDRA REDDY, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS AND: SMT. P. INDRAMMA W/O. PUTTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS HOUSEWORK, R/O. NITTUR VILLAGE, HARAPANAHALLI TALUK DAVANGERE DISTRICT-583131 (BY SMT. HALEEMA AMIN, ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.229/2018 (PCR NO.27/2016) FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 323, 324, 325, 326, 354, 354B, R/W 34 OF IPC, PENDING BEFORE THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:19310 CRL.P No. 281 of 2019 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
Operative part
2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: this petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.