SMT. A. RAJASHREE IYER v. SRI. VATSARAJ
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
submission, this criminal petition is dismissed as having
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 420, 494, 495
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The submission is noted. In view of the said submission, this criminal petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO.270 OF 2019 BETWEEN: SMT. A. RAJASHREE IYER D/O. SRI N. S. ANANTHA KESHAVA IYER AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.213D, 3RD PHASE 1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS WEST OF CHORD ROAD MANJUNATHANAGARA BENGALURU-560 010 (BY SRI R. B. SADASIVAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. VATSARAJ S/O. SRI M. C. RAMASWAMY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT NO.B-103 GAGANA VIHAR APARTMENTS RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA BENGALURU-560 098 &PETITIONER &RESPONDENT (BY SMT. BHUSHANI KUMAR, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 3RD A.C.M.M., AT BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.23280/2012, ARISING OUT OF PCR NO.11719/2012 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 420, 494 AND 495 OF IPC. Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:12889 CRL.P No. 270 of 2019 HC-KAR THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proceedings before the Trial Court is already concluded and therefore, this criminal petition has become infructuous.
Operative part
The submission is noted. In view of the said submission, this criminal petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
It is open for the petitioner to urge all grounds in the appeal that may be filed by the petitioner against the order passed by the Trial Court. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: submission, this criminal petition is dismissed as having
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 420, 494, 495.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.