✦ Karnataka High Court

M/S.THOLASI JEWELLERY MART v. M/S.THULASI AND THULASI

RAVI MALIMATH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Writ petition is disposed off accordingly

Provisions considered

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO.25/2012 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN : M/S.THOLASI JEWELLERY MART A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS AT NO.578, ASHOKA ROAD, MYSORE-570001 REP. BY ITS PARTNERS A) ASHWATH NARAYANA SETTY T.K. S/O LATE KRISHNAIAH SHETTY DECEASED ON 1.10.2002 REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS: B) MANOHAR BABU T.A. S/O LATE ASHWATH NARAYANA SETTY T.K. AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, C) D) ASHOK KUMAR T.A. S/O LATE ASHWATH NARAYANA SETTY T.K. AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, SHANTI KIRAN T.A. S/O LATE ASHWATH NARAYANA SETTY T.K. AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2 E) MOHAN KUMAR T.A S/O LATE ASWATH NARAYANA SETTY T.K. AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, ALL RESIDENTS OF DOOR NO.578, ASHOKA ROAD, MYSORE-570 001. ...PETITIONERS ( By Sri. R MURALIDHARAN, ADVOCATE ) AND : M/S.THULASI AND THULASI ASHOKA JEWELLERY HALL, DOOR NO. 576, ASHOKA ROAD, MYSORE 570001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS:- A) B) THULASI C.JAGADISH S/O THULASI CHANDRASHEKHAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS THULASI V.CHANDRA SHEKAR S/O T.VENKATACHALA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS BOTH RESIDENTS OF DOOR NO.576, ASHOKA ROAD, MYSORE-570001. ...RESPONDENTS ( By Sri. SHYAM KOUNDINYA A S, ADVOCATE ) -,-,- This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the order dated 12.8.2011 in Execution Petition No.454/10 3 on the file of I Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Mysore, vide Annexure-A and etc., This Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing in 'B' group, this day the Court made the following:-

Operative part

O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 30.7.2012 praying permission to convert this writ petition into Civil Revision Petition. The said memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is permitted to be converted into Civil Revision Petition within a period of one week. Writ petition is disposed off accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE *bk/

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ petition is disposed off accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments