✦ Karnataka High Court

MR. S. RAJU v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P No. 45 of 2024SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. In view of the above said memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 45 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MR. S. RAJU S/O DODDASHIVAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT NO.60, 3RD CROSS BARODA BANK COLONY, J P NAGAR, 7TH PHASE, PUTTENAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 078. (BY SRI SRIRAMKISHAN B.R, ADV.) AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY PUTTENAHALLI P.S. REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 002.

2.

MR. NANDA M S/O LATE MUNINANJAPPA K AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS R/AT NO.33A, 3RD CROSS IST MAIN, PUTTENAHALLI J.P. NAGAR, 7TH PHASE BENGALURU - 560 078. Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA …PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ANOOP KUMAR, HCGP FOR R-1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR BEARING CR.NO.342/2023 DATED 30.10.2023 REGISTERED BY PUTTENAHALLI P.S., i.e., RESPONDENT NO.1 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 384, 323, 504 AND 506 OF IPC PURSUANT TO ORDER DATED 16.10.2023 PASSED BY THE XXX - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:30431 CRL.P No. 45 of 2024 HC-KAR ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU WHICH IS PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE- B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 05.08.2025 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition since 'B' report has been filed by respondent No.1 - police against the petitioner.

2. The said memo is taken on record.

3.

In view of the above said memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

It is needless to mention that liberty to approach this Court is available to the petitioner if such a situation arises. Pending applications, if any, are also dismissed. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE NBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRL.P No. 45 of 2024). ← Search more judgments