RAJANNA v. LINGAMMANI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.319/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: RAJANNA S/O LATE CHIKKAMADAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT. HALLIKEREHUNDI VILLAGE CHATRA HOBLI NANJANGUD TALUK. (BY SRI. MOHAN K, ADV., [ABSENT]) …PETITIONER AND:

LINGAMMANI W/O MAHADEVAPPA D/O CHIKKAMADAPPA DOOR VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI MYSORE TALUK-570001.

MANJULA D/O LATE CHIKKAMADAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT HALLIKEREHUNDI VILLAGE CHATRA HOBLI NANJANGUD TALUK. (BY SMT. KUSUMA M, ADV.,) …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER DTD.22.10.2021 PASSED ON IA UNDER SECTION 152 - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:27182 W.P. No.319/2022 HC-KAR THAT IS ANNEXURE-E, F AND G BY THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, NANJANGUD IN OS.132/2006 VIDE ANNEXURE-H & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER On 29.04.2026 there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and to provide one more opportunity, the matter was adjourned. Even today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21