SRI PRAKASH B G v. SMT ANITHA M
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, petition is disposed of as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. XVI r. 1
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Accordingly, petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE SV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.141 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) …PETITIONER BETWEEN: SRI PRAKASH B G S/O LATE T S GANGAPPA AGE ABOUT 63 YEARS R/A 3/1/1, 12TH CROSS K.P. AGRAHARA, MAGADI ROAD BENGALURU – 560 023. (BY SRI. ARUN K.S., ADVOCATE) AND:
SMT ANITHA M W/O SRI PRAKASH B G (NOW DIVORCED VIDE ORDER DATED 7.3.2025) AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/A NO 217, 2ND FLOOR, 4TH MAIN, SAMPIGE LAYOUT VIJAYANAGARA BENGALURU – 560 079. SMT KAVYA P W/O SRI DILIP R AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/A NO.217, 2ND FLOOR 4TH MAIN, SAMPIGE LAYOUT VIJAYANAGARA BENGALURU – 560 079. SRI DILIP R S/O SRI RAJENDRA C., AGED MAJOR R/A NO.217, 2ND FLOOR 4TH MAIN, SAMPIGE LAYOUT VIJAYANAGARA BENGALURU – 560 079. Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:1657 WP No. 141 of 2026 HC-KAR
SRI N SATHISH S/O SRI K. NANJE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/A NO.20/2-1, 20TH CROSS 5TH MAIN, K P AGRAHARA MAGADI ROAD BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR BENGALURU – 560 023. …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION IMPUGNED ORDER DATED OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 01.12.2025 THEREBY REJECTING THE I.A.NO.27 FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN UNDER ORDER XVI RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC, IN O.S.NO.5673/2016 ON THE FILE OF XXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH.9), BENGALURU, VIDE ANNEXURE-F. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. The same reads as under:
In the above matter, during the pendency of the present writ petition, the Trial Court had passed the order rectifying the impugned order vide its order dated 7.1.2026, Thus, the I.A.No.27 filed by the petitioner has been allowed. Thus, the prayer sought in the present Writ Petition has been granted by the Trial Court by rectifying the impugned order. Wherefore, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdrawn the above Writ Petition, in the interest of justice.
- 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:1657 WP No. 141 of 2026 HC-KAR
Operative part
Accordingly, petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE SV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, petition is disposed of as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XVI r. 1.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.