LADAKH AT JAMMU CRM(M) No. 949 of 2024 · High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
In view of the above, present petition is allowed and the impugned FIR
Key paragraphs
- Para 0202. In view of the above, present petition is allowed and the impugned FIR qua the petitioner is quashed.
Judgment
Through: Mr. Rahul Pant, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Dhruv Pant, Advocate q UT of J&K and Anr. .…. Respondent(s) Through: None Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER 25.02.2026
Latest status report stands filed, a perusal whereof reveals that petitioner at the relevant point of time, when mutation in question came to be attested, was not posted in village Kalakam, where the land in question is situated and he was posted in village Kote. It is categoric finding of investigation agency that nothing incriminating could be established against the petitioner in the investigation conducted so far. A status report also reveals that in reply to a questionnaire served to the accused officials, Patwari, Shri Suresh Kumar has admitted that the aforesaid mutation i.e. mutation No. 1426/J dated 24.04.2015 was entered by him in the Mutation Register.
Operative part
In view of the above, present petition is allowed and the impugned FIR qua the petitioner is quashed.
Disposed of with connected application(s). (Rajesh Sekhri) Judge Jammu 25.02.2026 Riya Kochhar
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.