✦ High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh

CRM(M) No. 951 of 2022 · High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh

CRM(M) No. 951 of 2022SINDHU SHARMA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

In this view of the matter, this petition is dismissed as

Judgment

Operative part

Through:- Mr. Navneet Dubey, Advocate V/s Madhvi Bhatyal Through:- Mr. Jasbir Singh Jasrotia, Advocate …..Respondent(s) CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE ORDER 11.03.2024 Learned counsel for both the sides submit that the respondent has made a complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against the petitioners and now the parties have amicably entered into compromise. Mr. Dubey, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has already undertaken that she will withdraw the complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 which is pending in the Court of Railway Magistrate, Jammu. In this view of the matter, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JAMMU Ram Murti/PS 11.03.2024 (Sindhu Sharma) Judge

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In this view of the matter, this petition is dismissed as

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — s. 12.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh or eCourts case status (search case no. CRM(M) No. 951 of 2022). ← Search more judgments