Case:- WP(C) No. 1729/2020 v. Deputy Labour Commissioner Jammu & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 s. 7(7)
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 06.12.2023 Shivalee Whether the order is speaking Whether the order is reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No
Judgment
Through: Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate. Vs Deputy Labour Commissioner Jammu and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (06.12.2023)
The respondent no. 3 was in the employment of the petitioner. On the basis of her services so rendered to the petitioner, the respondent no. 3 became entitled to gratuity.
However, even after having been relieved from the services of the petitioner in June, 2010, the respondent no. 3 was not paid her gratuity claim by the petitioner and this state of default continued to persist which constrained the respondent no. 3 to petition the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Jammu as being the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 on file no. 76/P.G.Act/2018 on 18.08.2018 asking for release of her gratuity.
This petition came to be disposed of by the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 vide its award dated 24.06.2019 thereby holding the petitioner liable to make payment of Rs. 1,41,124/- (Rupees one lakh forty-one thousand one hundred twenty-four only) along with interest of Rs. 1,25,935/- (Rupees one lakh twenty- five thousand nine hundred thirty-five only) @ 10% per annum w.e.f.
18.07.2010 to 24.06.2019 in favour of the respondent no. 3. 2 WP(C) No. 1729/2020
Thus, the total amount of Rs. 2,67,059/- (Rupees two lakh sixty-seven thousand fifty-nine only) was directed to be deposited within 30 days from the date of passing of the said order dated 24.06.2019.
Against this order, the petitioner preferred a statutory appeal under section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 before the appellate authority of Labour Commissioner, Jammu on its file no. 49-PGAct-2019 dated
29.07.2019 which came to be dismissed by the appellate authority vide its judgment dated 29.07.2020 conforming the order passed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Controlling Authority), Jammu, thus, confirming the entitlement of the respondent no. 3 to earn the gratuity amount payable in her favour along with the interest liability accrued thereupon.
The deposit of the gratuity amount as directed had come to take place at the time of filing of the appeal by the petitioner before the appellate authority of Labour Commissioner, J&K, Jammu, which amount came to be withdrawn by the respondent no. 3 and later on, the appeal filed by the petitioner also came to be dismissed meaning thereby at the time of filing of the present writ petition and its disposal taking place as on today, the basis of the lis has gone missing and the writ petition is now of the academic interest only which is meant to serve no purpose.
Operative part
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 06.12.2023 Shivalee Whether the order is speaking Whether the order is reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 — s. 7(7).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.