LADAKH AT JAMMU OWP No. 662 of 2016 · High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh
Judgment
Through :- Mr. Sumir Pandita, Advocate V/s Union of India and others Through :- None ….Respondent(s) Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE ORDER 24.07.2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition, due to subsequent developments, has been rendered infructuous. Therefore, he has instructions not to press this petition. His statement is taken on record. Accordingly, this writ petition along with connected application is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Jammu: 24.07.2023. Vinod, PS
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh or eCourts case status (search case no. LADAKH AT JAMMU OWP No. 662 of 2016).
← Search more judgments