Judgment · High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh

Through: Mr. A. M. Dar, Advocate with Mr. Danish Majid Dar and Bhat Shafi, Advocates ….. Petitioner(s) Union Territory of JK & Ors. V/s Through: Mr. Alla Ud Din Ganai, AAG. CORAM: …..Respondent(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE. ORDER 07.06.2023 The short submission which has been made by the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner is that he will be satisfied if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to treat this writ petition as representation on behalf of the petitioner and accord consideration to the same within some reasonable time frame. On asking of the Court, Mr. Alla Ud Din Ganai, the learned AAG enters appearance on behalf of respondents and is not averse to the disposal of the present petition at this stage or else to the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. However, Mr. Alla Ud Din Ganai, the leaend AAG, submits that the representations of the petitioner would be considered in accordance with the rules and as per law occupying the field. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the record. With the consent of appearing counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to treat this writ petition as representation on behalf of the petitioner and accord consideration to the same strictly in conformity with the rules and as per law within a period of six weeks from the date copy of the writ petition along with its annexures as also a copy of this order is made available to the respondents. While according consideration to the representation of the petitioner, the respondents are directed to accord due consideration to the recommendations made in favour of the petitioner. Writ petition disposed of in the manner as indicated above. SRINAGAR: 07.06.2023 “Hamid” (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge