✦ High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh

SRINAGAR CRM(M) No. 117/2023 CrLM No. 283/2023 CrLM No. 284/2023 Shafayat Hussain & Ors. v. Central Bureau of Investigation”

LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) No. 117 of 2023JAVED IQBAL WANI2 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

the trial Court has caused immense prejudice to the rights and interests of the petitioner. Mr Aqib would pray for disposal of the instant petition at this stage with an innocuous directions to the trial Court to dispose of the bail application of the petitioner expeditiously without any further delay. Mr Sajad Ashraf, GA, present, on asking of the Court enters appearance. Mr Sajad is not averse to the disposal of the instant petition at this stage or to the prayer made by the appearing counsel for the petitioner. Having regard to the aforesaid position, the instant petition is taken up for final disposal and is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the bail application of the petitioner claimed to be pending before it expeditiously and preferably within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before the trial Court by the petitioner having regard to the judgement of the Apex Court passed in case titled as “Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation”, reported in AIR 2022 (SC) 3386. Disposed of along with connected CrLM/s. (JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 12.04.2023 Ishaq

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh or eCourts case status (search case no. LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) No. 117 of 2023). ← Search more judgments