✦ High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh

Judgment · High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh

C) No. 367 of 2021PANKAJ MITHAL

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The writ petition is disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Accordingly, we dispose of this petition with a liberty to the petitioners either to approach the Civil Court or to submit a representation before the Deputy Commissioner, Baramulla, who will consider the same and after verifying the facts from the record may pass suitable…
  • Para 55. The writ petition is disposed of. (PUNEET GUPTA) (PANKAJ MITHAL) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE SRINAGAR 09.09.2022

Judgment

Mr. B. S. Bali, Adv. Vs. Union Territory of JK & Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Kala, AAG CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE

O R D E R 09.09.2022

1.

The petitioners have preferred this writ petition seeking compensation in respect of 6 Kanals and 10 Marlas of land forming part of Khasra No. 177 situate at village Dehbugh Tehsil Kunzer, District Baramulla, Kashmir.

2.

The petitioners contend that they were divested of the possession of the aforesaid land 40 years ago and till date they have not been paid any compensation.

3.

The petitioners are approaching this court admittedly after a long distance of time of 40 years and, as such, the petition suffers from delay and laches. It is also not clear from the petition as to the exact date or probable year in which they were dispossessed and whether the said dispossession was in accordance with law or other-wise. In such circumstances, it is next to impossible for this Court to come to any conclusion in the matter so as to grant any relief to the petitioners. The petitioners, in such circumstances, either have a remedy to approach the Civil Court or to prefer a representation before the Deputy Commissioner,

4.

Accordingly, we dispose of this petition with a liberty to the petitioners either to approach the Civil Court or to submit a representation before the Deputy Commissioner, Baramulla, who will consider the same and after verifying the facts from the record may pass suitable order in accordance with law.

Operative part

5.

The writ petition is disposed of. (PUNEET GUPTA) (PANKAJ MITHAL) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE SRINAGAR 09.09.2022

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh or eCourts case status (search case no. C) No. 367 of 2021). ← Search more judgments