✦ High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh

Ziyarat Batamaloo through Mohd Maqbool v. Jammu and Kashmir Special Tribunal

Sts No. 505 of 2000RAJNESH OSWAL

Case at a glance

Bench
RAJNESH OSWAL

Outcome

Disposed of

The present petition is disposed of in terms of aforesaid

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. The present petition is disposed of in terms of aforesaid directions and the respondent No. 2 is permitted to assail the order which is subject matter of the appeal by availing remedy as is available under law within a period of three months from…

Judgment

AT SRINAGAR Ziyarat Batamaloo through Mohd Maqbool OWP No. 498/2001 ….. Petitioner (s) Through: Mr. Z A Shah, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Hanan Kalwal, Adv. V/s Jammu and Kashmir Special Tribunal Through: Mr. M Sultan, Adv. for R2. ….. Respondent(s) Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal, Judge ORDER 29.08.2025

1.

The petitioner, through the medium of present petition, has, assailed the order dated 13.08.2021 passed by respondent No. 1 in File No. STS/505/2000 titled Jalal ud din Bhat Vs. Intizama Committee Ziyarat Batamaloo and for directing the respondent No. 1 to transfer the file to the Appellate Authority as prescribed under J&K Wakafs Act, 2001 for disposal under law.

2.

Mr. Z A Shah, learned Sr. Adv. and Mr. Mr. M Sultan, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the respondent No. 2 respectively are unanimous in their submissions that as on date, Jammu and Kashmir Wakafs Act, 2001 is not in operation and has been repealed by Wakafs Act, 1995 (Central), in view of the P a g e | 2 OWP No. 498/2001 enactment of J&K Reorganization Act, 2019 but no Tribunal has been established as on date in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir in terms of the Act of 1995.

3.

In view of the controversy at hand, the writ petition as well as appeal pending before respondent No. 1 are disposed of by permitting the respondent No. 2 to avail the appropriate remedy as is available under law to assail the order which is subject matter of the appeal pending before the learned Tribunal.

4.

Mr. M Sultan, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 submits that sufficient time be granted to avail the remedy as is available under law.

Operative part

5.

The present petition is disposed of in terms of aforesaid directions and the respondent No. 2 is permitted to assail the order which is subject matter of the appeal by availing remedy as is available under law within a period of three months from today.

6.

Copy of order be sent to the learned Tribunal for information. (Rajnesh Oswal) Judge SRINAGAR 29.08.2025 Aasif

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The present petition is disposed of in terms of aforesaid

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

J&K Wakafs Act, 2001; Jammu and Kashmir Wakafs Act, 2001; Wakafs Act, 1995; J&K Reorganization Act, 2019.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh or eCourts case status (search case no. Sts No. 505 of 2000). ← Search more judgments