& KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CrlA(D) No. 1/2024 Aadil Hussain Bhat & Ors. v. Union Territory Th. Police Station Qazigund
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The appeal is disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Sr. No. 1 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CrlA(D) No. 1/2024 Aadil Hussain Bhat & Ors. …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Moulvi Aijaz, Adv. Vs. Union Territory Th. Police Station Qazigund ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Maha Majeed, AC vice Mr. Mohsin Qadiri, Sr. AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL SREEDHARAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
Operative part
O R D E R 02.08.2024 The present appeal has been preferred by the appellants against the order dated 29th December 2023 passed by the learned trial court, whereby the application for grant of bail moved by the appellants was dismissed. This Court has been informed that out of 12 witnesses, all 12 have been examined for prosecution. The case is presently at the stage of statement of the accused under Section 342 CrPC (as applicable in the Union Territory of J&K) and the final arguments. Under the circumstances, without entering into the merits of the appeal, the same is disposed of with the consent of learned counsel for the appellants, with a request to the learned trial court to conclude this case as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months from the date of this order. The appeal is disposed of. (JAVED IQBAL WANI) (ATUL SREEDHARAN) JUDGE JUDGE SRINAGAR: 02.08.2024 Altaf
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 342.
Which court decided this case, and when?
High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, on 29 Dec 2023. The bench was ATUL SREEDHARAN, JAVED IQBAL WANI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.