✦ High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh

Judgment · High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh

ALI MOHAMMAD MAGREY

Judgment

Through: Mr. Rouf Ahmad Parry, Vice, Mr. M.Y. Parray, Adv. V/s State of J and K and Ors. …..Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Sheikh Feroz, Dy. AG. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALI MOHAMMAD MAGREY, JUDGE ORDER 01.06.2022 As per the policy notified by the Government in terms of the Govt. Order No. 127-FCS&CA of 2016, the applicant was required to be within the age group of 18 to 37 years for purpose of allotment of Fair Price Shop in his favour, but the age of petitioner was 39 years 6 months and 2 days. Mr. Sheikh Feroz, Dy. AG has invited the attention of the Court to the rejection of the claim of the petitioner made interms of order dated

29.09.2018, which the petitioner has not challenged. However, notwithstanding the challenge of the said rejection order, the petitioner is already seeking quashment of the approval granted in favour of the respondent No. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record. Since the petitioner is not found entitled as pr the order impugned with respect to requirement of eligibility for Fair Price Shop. Therefore, the instant petition has no merit and same is dismissed. (ALI MOHAMMAD MAGREY) JUDGE SRINAGAR 01.06.2022 “Mir Arif”

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments