Jugut Yadav v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
this petition is dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner to approach
Provisions considered
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 s. 34
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the aforesaid remedy, the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable. As such, this petition is dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for the reliefs, which he has claimed…
Judgment
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ : : : ------ 05/ 10.07.2024 The petitioner is aggrieved with the order passed under Mr. Abhay Kumar Mishra, Advocate. Mr. Abhinay Kumar, A.C. to G.A.-I. Mrs. Sweety Topno, Advocate. For the Petitioner For the State For the NHAI Section 3(G)(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, which is an award in terms of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which is evident from Section 3(G)(6) of the National Highways Act.
Once an award is passed and if the party is dissatisfied with the same, he has to file an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and challenge the same before an appropriate forum.
Operative part
In view of the aforesaid remedy, the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable. As such, this petition is dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for the reliefs, which he has claimed in the present writ petition. Pending I.A., if any, stands dismissed. Amitesh/- (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) -1-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: this petition is dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner to approach
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 34; Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.