✦ Jharkhand High Court

Rashmi Kumari v. The State of Jharkhand

JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 6202 of 2023S N PATHAK

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Learned counsel for the respondents does not object for the same. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Rohit/- (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)

Judgment

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK For Petitioner For Respondents ------ : Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate : Md. Asghar, AC to Sr. SC-II ------ 04/ 22.07.2024 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition with a liberty to raise his grievances before the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. If such grievances are raised the respondents are free to consider the same in accordance with law taking into account the provisions of Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

Operative part

3.

Learned counsel for the respondents does not object for the same. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Rohit/- (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Jharkhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 6202 of 2023). ← Search more judgments