PRAMOD CHANDRAVANSHI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of above, this petition is disposed of with liberty to
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of above, this petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to avail alternative remedy in light of the above provisions. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) SI/,
Judgment
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners For the State For the NHAI :- :- :- --- Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate Mr. Prashant Kumar Rai, Advocate Mrs. Sweety Topno, Advocate Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, Advocate ---- 5/20.08.2024 The surviving defects are ignored.
Prayer in this petition has been made for payment of higher amount of compensation.
Learned counsel for the respondent State as well as NHAI submit that compensation is already decided in favour of the petitioners however, the petitioners are aggrieved with quantum of compensation and as such the petitioners are having alternative remedy under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in light of the provisions made in section 3-G(6) of National Highways Act, 1956.
Operative part
In view of above, this petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to avail alternative remedy in light of the above provisions. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) SI/,
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of above, this petition is disposed of with liberty to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 34.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.