Shahla Saini v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. This petition stands disposed of. Pending I.A, if any, stands disposed of. Satyarthi/ (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Judgment
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner For the State --------- : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate :Mr. Suresh Kumar, S.C. (L&C)-II Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, A.C. to S.C. (L&C)-II 06/Dated: 13/07/2023 This petition has been filed for direction upon the respondent- authorities to register the F.I.R.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed complaint against the respondent no. 6 in which cognizance has been taken thereafter the respondent no. 6 started giving threatening to the petitioner for that the complaint has been filed however the authority concerned is not taking any action against the respondent no.6.
Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that he has got instruction that said complaint was disposed of.
Operative part
The Court finds that the petitioner is having alternative remedy and straightway this petition has been filed before this Court. The Court is not inclined to exercise its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy.
This petition stands disposed of. Pending I.A, if any, stands disposed of. Satyarthi/ (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.