Chandan Kumar Bharti v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439(2)
Judgment
The State of Jharkhand Antaryami Barik, son of Muralidhar Barik, resident of Nuasahi, P.O. Mahitpur, P.S. Khaira, District- Balasore, Odisha-756048 … Opposite Parties
Operative part
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner For the Opposite Party-State ----- : Mr. Abhishekh Gautam, Advocate : Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, A.P.P. ----- 03/11.10.2022. This petition has been filed for cancellation of bail granted to opposite party no.2 in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.80/2018, corresponding to G.R. Case No.866/2018, pending in the court of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Godda. The learned Sessions Judge has power to cancel the bail under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. In view of this fact, this petition is being disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the learned Sessions Judge by way of filing petition under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of. Ajay/ (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.