Charku Mahto v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
discussed above, the anticipatory bail application is allowed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 414
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 41A, 438(2)
Judgment
Operative part
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----- For the Petitioners For the State : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Satish Prasad, A.P.P. ----- Oral Order 03/Dated: 27.09.2022 The anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of petitioners, namely Charku Mahto and Arif Ansari who are apprehending their arrest in connection with Mahuwatand PS Case No. 13 of 2022, corresponding to G.R. No.658 of 2022, for the offence registered under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 21 of MMRD Act, 1957, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Bermo at Tenughat, is pressed into motion. Heard the parties. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are the owner of the seized tractors from which 100 cft. and 735 cft. sand were loaded. The learned APP opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the learned counsels and the facts as discussed above, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of two weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners named above shall be released on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security money and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. The petitioners will cooperate in the investigation and will appear on notice under Section 41A of Cr.P.C and comply with the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Rohit/- (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: discussed above, the anticipatory bail application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 414; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 41A, 438(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.