Anil Prasad v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Thus, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Pending I.A.s, if any, stands disposed of.
Judgment
1. Anil Prasad, aged about 54 years, son of Late Ram Prakash Prasad, resident of Tupudana, P.O. and P.S. Hatia, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand).
2. Pawan Kishore Verma, aged about 52 years, son of Late Krishnanandan Kishore Verma, resident of ESI Hospital, Maithon, P.O Maithon Dam and P.S.-Chirkunda, District- Dhanbad (Jharkhand).
3. Mahendra Pal, aged about 56 years, son of Late Shiv Shankar Prasad Pal, resident of New Colony, Korra, P.O.-Korra, P.S.- Sadar, District-Hazaribag (Jharkhand).
4. Sheela Kumari, aged about 54 years wife of Sri Mahendra Pal, resident of New Colony, Korra, P.O.-Korra, P.S. Sadar, District- Hazaribag (Jharkhand).
5. Laleshwar Singh, aged about 56 years, son of Late Kunwar Singh, resident of High School, Chinia, P.O. and P.S.-Chinia, District-Garhwa (Jharkhand). … Petitioner(s). Versus
The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary Department of Personnel Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi, P.O. Dhurwa P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.
Jharkhand Public Service Commission, through its Secretary, having office at Circular Road, P.O. GPO, P.S. Lalpur, Town and District Ranchi, Jharkhand.
Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, having office at Circular Road, P.O.-GPO, P.S. Lalpur, Town and District Ranchi, Jharkhand. … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shekhar Prasad Sinha, Advocate For the State For the JPSC Mr. Mahi, Advocate : Ms. P. Tiwary, AC to AG : Mr. Abhay Prakash, Advocate Mr. Durgesh Agarwal, Advocate …...... 13 /04.02.2026: Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioners and the learned counsel representing the respondents.
2. Both the parties submits that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been set at rest in WP(S) No. 4928 of 2021 vide order dated 28.04.2025. Both the parties also submits that this 1 case is arising out of the same examination. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the Letters Patent Appeal against the aforesaid judgment has been filed and is pending.
3. Considering the fact that the issue has already been decided by the Single Bench, I am not inclined to keep this writ petition pending.
Operative part
Thus, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 28.04.2025 passed in WP(S) No. 4928 of 2021.
It is further made clear that the final order passed in the Letters Patent Appeal will also cover these petitioners.
Pending I.A.s, if any, stands disposed of.
04.02.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 06.02.2026 (ANANDA SEN, J.) 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.