✦ Jharkhand High Court

M/S. RLJ CONCAST PVT. LTD., a Company registered v. The Central Coalfields Limited

JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 4316 of 2024ARUN KUMAR RAI3 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
ARUN KUMAR RAI

Outcome

Disposed of

case, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed in the case of Adhunik Power and Natural Resources Ltd. v. Central Coalfields Ltd. in W.P. (T) No. 2023 of 2021 disposed of on…

Judgment

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------- For the Petitioner For the Resp. 1 to 3 For the Resp. 4 to 6 : Mr. Nitin Kumar Pasari, Advocate : Ms. Sidhi Jalan, Advocate : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate : Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Advocate : Mr. Anurag Vijay, Advocate : Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate : Mr. Durgesh Agarwal, Advocate 1 Order No. 02/Dated 5th August, 2024 ------

1.

This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking therein the following reliefs :-

A) For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing upon the Respondents to show cause as to how and under what authority of law, the amount realised from the Petitioner in the guise of Tax Collected at Source (TCS) is neither being refunded, nor being adjusted towards future tax liability of the Petitioner. B) For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, holding and declaring that the action of the Respondents in neither granting refund of the money illegally realized from the Petitioner, nor facilitating adjustment of such money towards future tax liability of the Petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 265 of the Constitution of India. C) Consequent upon showing cause, if any, and on being satisfied that the action of Respondents is illegal and arbitrary, the Respondents be directed to refund the amount which had been illegally realized from the Petitioner in the guise of Tax Collected at Source (TCS). D) For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing upon the Respondents to pay interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the said amount from the date, such money had been realised from the Petitioner, till the date of refund. IN THE ALTERNATIVE E) For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondents to deposit the said amount along with statutory interest pertaining to Tax Collected at Source (TCS) in the Permanent Account Number (PAN) of the Petitioner and the same 2 be allowed to be adjusted against the future tax liability.

2.

Heard Mr. Nitin Kumar Pasari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel appearing for the respondent CCL and, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel for the Revenue.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently contends that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Adhunik Power and Natural Resources Ltd. v. Central Coalfields Ltd. passed in W.P. (T) No. 2023 of 2021 dated 5th October, 2023, hence, this matter may be disposed of in the light of the said judgment.

4.

Learned counsel for the respondents do not have any objection to the aforesaid submission.

Operative part

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed in the case of Adhunik Power and Natural Resources Ltd. v. Central Coalfields Ltd. in W.P. (T) No. 2023 of 2021 disposed of on 5th October,

2023. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, A.C.J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) Birendra/ 3

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: case, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Companies Act, 2013; Constitution of India — arts. 14, 226, 265.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Jharkhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 4316 of 2024). ← Search more judgments