Renu Kumari v. The State of Jharkhandthrough Vigilance … … Opp. Party
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ss. 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)
Judgment
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner For the State : Mr. A. K. Sahani, Advocate : A.P.P. ----- 2/04.10.2013 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under Sections 7/13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in (Special Case No.28 of 2013). Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been alleged to have been caught red handed while accepting the illegal gratification but for that she has sufficiently been punished, as she has been in custody since last three months and that the charge-sheet has been submitted. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (Vigilance), Ranchi in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 27 of 2013 (Special Case No. 28 of 2013). (R.R. Prasad, J.) Rakesh/akt
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.