Josin @ Jospin @ Marang Kora @ Josin Hembram v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SUBHASH CHAND
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 395
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the F.I.R. of this case was lodged against the unknown persons. The name of the applicant has transpired during investigation in confessional statement of the co-accused. No incriminating article was recovered from the possession of the…
- Para 55. In view of the submissions made and materials on record, the bail application of the applicant is hereby allowed. Let the applicant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction…
Judgment
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND ------- ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pathak, Advocate Mr. Vijay Narayan Mishra, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Pathak, Advocate : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, PP For the State -------- Order No.05 /Dated: 22nd December, 2023
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.
This bail application has been filed on behalf of the abovenamed applicant with prayer to release on bail in connection with Gopikandar P.S. Case No.08 of 2021, S.T. No.151 of 2021 registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-III, Dumka.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the F.I.R. of this case was lodged against the unknown persons. The name of the applicant has transpired during investigation in confessional statement of the co-accused. No incriminating article was recovered from the possession of the applicant. No TIP was conducted to identify the complicity of the petition in commission of the alleged offence. The applicant has been languishing in jail since 29.11.2022. The co-accused, namely, Raj Lal Hembrom has been granted bail by this Bench vide order dated 18.04.2022 in B.A. No.2390 of 2022. In view of the above, contended to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State vehemently opposed the contentions made by the learned counsel for the applicant.
In view of the submissions made and materials on record, the bail application of the applicant is hereby allowed. Let the applicant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in aforesaid case. (Subhash Chand, J.) Madhav/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.