Satnam Singh v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed off accordingly
Provisions considered
Judgment
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA For the Petitioner For the State : Ms. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, A.P.P. ------ Order No. 02 Dated- 20.04.2023 ------ Heard learned counsel for the parties. The criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed under Section 482 CrPC by the petitioner with a prayer for modification of the order dated 06.02.2023 passed in A.B.A. No. 56 of 2023. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that vide order dated 06.02.2023 passed in A.B.A. No. 56 of 2023, the petitioner was given the privileges of anticipatory bail by this Court and was directed to surrender before the court below within four weeks. It is further submitted that the petitioner could not surrender within stipulated time due to the fact that the petitioner was suffering from Typhoid. Hence, the time period for the petitioner to surrender before the court below in terms of the order dated 06.02.2023 passed in A.B.A. No. 56 of 2023 to be extended by two weeks. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the prayer for extension of the time for the petitioner to surrender in the court below in terms of the order dated 06.02.2023 passed in A.B.A. No. 56 of 2023 is allowed. Hence, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below within two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order in terms of the order dated
Operative part
06.02.2023 passed in A.B.A. No. 56 of 2023. The order dated 06.02.2023 passed in A.B.A. No. 56 of 2023 is modified to the aforesaid extent. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed off accordingly. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Umesh/-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed off accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.